Current:Home > InvestFastexy:Regulators approve plans for new Georgia Power plants driven by rising demand -WealthRise Academy
Fastexy:Regulators approve plans for new Georgia Power plants driven by rising demand
Chainkeen Exchange View
Date:2025-04-08 16:59:51
ATLANTA (AP) — Utility regulators on FastexyTuesday approved a plan for Georgia Power Co. to expand a power plant southwest of Atlanta.
The Georgia Public Service Commission voted 5-0 for the unit of Atlanta-based Southern Co. to build three new fossil-fuel burning units at Plant Yates, near Newnan.
The company has declined to say how much it will spend on the plants, which will burn either natural gas or diesel fuel to generate electricity, but commission staff members have said similar recent plants in other states have cost $800 million or more.
The commission greenlighted building the plants in April, when it approved a special plan to add generating capacity because the utility said demand was increasing more rapidly than previous projections, driven in part by a boom in computer data centers locating in Georgia. The company won permission to build the units itself, without seeking outside bids for electrical generation, because its projections show it needs more electricity by the end 2026.
“Simply put, we need to build these units and we need to build them now,” Georgia Power lawyer Steve Hewitson told commissioners Thursday during a committee meeting.
Normally, commissioners approve long-term generating and rate plans for Georgia Power once every three years, but this approval came mid-cycle. Because the regular generating and rate plans will be up for consideration next year, customers will see no change in bills because of Plant Yates until 2026.
Georgia Power customers have seen their bills rise sharply in recent years because of higher natural gas costs, the cost of construction projects, including two new nuclear reactors at Plant Vogtle near Augusta, and other factors. A typical Georgia Power residential customer now pays more than $173 a month, including taxes.
Environmentalists and customer advocates questioned letting Georgia Power build new fossil fuel plants without going through a competitive process. Using those sources would mean Georgia Power emits more climate-altering carbon dioxide than using solar generation, other renewable sources and conservation.
They also argue that it leaves customers more exposed to the risk of rising natural gas costs, which have been a big ingredient in recent bill increases. The units would mostly run on natural gas but would switch to diesel when electrical demand is at peak and more natural gas can’t be purchased or delivered by pipeline.
Curt Thompson, a lawyer representing the Sierra Club and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, argued Thursday that Georgia Power should bear some of the risks of rising natural gas costs. In Georgia, the company has been allowed to pass through the entire costs of fuel for its plants, including the combustion turbines it wants to build at Yates.
“The utility industry in general and Georgia Power, in particular, have become increasingly reliant on gas,” Thompson said. “The Yates CTs would only deepen that gas addiction.”
Opponents had again asked the commission to wait until it could examine bids to provide generation, even though commissioners had approved the Yates plan in April
“Those resources may well be cheaper, cleaner, and a better fit for Georgia Power customers,” Thompson said,
Georgia Power agreed it wouldn’t charge for cost overruns for the turbines unless they are caused by factors outside the company’s “reasonable control.” It’s supposed to submit reports on construction progress every six months.
veryGood! (647)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Warming Trends: Carbon-Neutral Concrete, Climate-Altered Menus and Olympic Skiing in Vanuatu
- New York Is Facing a Pandemic-Fueled Home Energy Crisis, With No End in Sight
- Indian Court Rules That Nature Has Legal Status on Par With Humans—and That Humans Are Required to Protect It
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Pamper Yourself With the Top 18 Trending Beauty Products on Amazon Right Now
- Proteger a la icónica salamandra mexicana implíca salvar uno de los humedales más importantes del país
- What has been driving inflation? Economists' thinking may have changed
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- BBC chair quits over links to loans for Boris Johnson — the man who appointed him
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Warming Trends: A Possible Link Between Miscarriages and Heat, Trash-Eating Polar Bears and a More Hopeful Work of Speculative Climate Fiction
- Lack of Loggers Is Hobbling Arizona Forest-Thinning Projects That Could Have Slowed This Year’s Devastating Wildfires
- With Biden in Europe Promising to Expedite U.S. LNG Exports, Environmentalists on the Gulf Coast Say, Not So Fast
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- In BuzzFeed fashion, 5 takeaways from Ben Smith's 'Traffic'
- Tucker Carlson says he'll take his show to Twitter
- BBC chair quits over links to loans for Boris Johnson — the man who appointed him
Recommendation
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Would you live next to co-workers for the right price? This company is betting yes
More Mountain Glacier Collapses Feared as Heat Waves Engulf the Northern Hemisphere
The U.S. has more banks than anywhere on Earth. That shapes the economy in many ways
Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
Why does the U.S. have so many small banks? And what does that mean for our economy?
A Republican Leads in the Oregon Governor’s Race, Taking Aim at the State’s Progressive Climate Policies
Kyle Richards and Mauricio Umansky Address “Untrue” Divorce Rumors