Current:Home > InvestWorld’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt -WealthRise Academy
World’s Leading Polluters Have Racked Up a $10 Trillion Carbon Debt
View
Date:2025-04-18 22:16:30
The countries most responsible for global warming owe the rest of the world a tremendous debt, with the author of a new study published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change putting the figure at $10 trillion.
The author came up with that number by calculating how much CO2 each country emitted per capita since 1960, generally recognized as the onset of the worst of human-caused global warming. Countries with high per capita emissions carry a carbon debt while countries with lower per capita emissions have a carbon credit.
“We in the rich world have over-contributed to the problem and consequently there is a debt associated with that that needs to be honored in some way,” said lead author Damon Matthews a researcher at Concordia University in Montreal, Canada.
That was the purpose of the Green Climate Fund, established in 2010 by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to help vulnerable countries address the challenges of climate change. Its initial goal was to distribute $100 billion each year in public and private funding until 2020. So far wealthy nations have pledged $10.2 billion, a fraction of the debt, according to the new study.
The United States is responsible for about 40 percent of the debt.
The study concludes the carbon debt of high-emitting countries totals 250 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide since 1990. The U.S. government calculates the social cost of CO2 emissions –including property damage from increased flooding, reduced agricultural productivity and adverse effects on human health– is about $40 per metric ton of CO2.
Multiplying the two figures produces the $10 trillion figure.
Others, however, say Matthews’ accounting may be overly simplistic. According to Jan Fuglestvedt research director of the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, Norway, the dates chosen to calculate the debt are arbitrary. Emissions since 1960 account for about 66 percent of CO2 emissions since the start of the industrial era in 1750; emissions since 1990 are 36 percent.
Counting earlier emissions could change the debts owed by different countries, although Fuglestvedt admitted deciding when to start counting is more of a policy choice than a scientific one.
“When should we know and when should we start counting the emissions that change climate?” Fuglestvedt asked. “That goes beyond natural sciences.”
Another issue with the study is counting emissions only by country, said Liane Schalatek, who has attended Green Climate Fund board meetings on behalf of the Heinrich Böll Foundation North America, where she is associate director.
“The biggest polluters in absolute terms are not necessarily countries but entities within countries, that is very often large corporations,” Schalatek said. “If you put their pollution together [they] actually make up the majority of the pollution.”
A 2013 study funded in part by the Böll Foundation found nearly two-thirds of carbon dioxide emitted since the 1750s can be traced to the 90 largest fossil fuel and cement producers, most of which are still operating.
Although the Green Climate Fund does not address corporate responsibility, Schalatek said it is time to stop haggling about where this money will come from and time to start giving larger sums.
“They should really just say 100 billion is the minimum and we should be thinking about how we can scale that up post 2020,” Schalatek said.
Karen Orenstein, an international policy analyst for Friends of the Earth, said, however, that studies like this don’t address the real reason the carbon debt exists.
“A lot of this isn’t really about what science says or academics say,” Orenstein said. “It’s political.”
veryGood! (2)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Sundance returns in-person to Park City — with more submissions than ever
- 'Fleishman Is in Trouble' is a Trojan horse for women's stories, says Lizzy Caplan
- Pamela Anderson on her new memoir — and why being underestimated is a secret weapon
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Jimmy Kimmel celebrates 20 years as a (reluctant) late night TV institution
- He watched the Koons 'balloon dog' fall and shatter ... and wants to buy the remains
- Hot and kinda bothered by 'Magic Mike'; plus Penn Badgley on bad boys
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- In 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,' the setting is subatomic — as are the stakes
Ranking
- Bodycam footage shows high
- How should we be 'Living'? Kurosawa and Ishiguro tackle the question, 70 years apart
- M3GAN, murder, and mass queer appeal
- 'Avatar' marks 6 straight weeks at No. 1 as it surpasses $2 billion in ticket sales
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Beyoncé's Grammy-nominated 'Renaissance' is a thotty and ethereal work of art
- Tate Modern's terrace is a nuisance for wealthy neighbors, top U.K. court rules
- A daytime TV departure: Ryan Seacrest is leaving 'Live with Kelly and Ryan'
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Alec Baldwin will be charged with involuntary manslaughter in 'Rust' shooting death
'Oscar Wars' spotlights bias, blind spots and backstage battles in the Academy
'I Have Some Questions For You' is a dark, uncomfortable story that feels universal
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
'Wait Wait' for March 4, 2023: With Not My Job guest Malala Yousafzai
'El Juicio' detalla el régimen de terror de la dictadura argentina 1976-'83
'Black on Black' celebrates Black culture while exploring history and racial tension